Between solidarity and the conflict of generations. Intergenerational relations in biographical narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2019.49.3.04Keywords:
Generation, biographical method, biographical work, relational structuresAbstract
Objectives: The purpose of this text is to identify the main types of intergenerational relationships and methods of integration different generations applied in everyday life. Recognition of these practices should be used in inclusion policy.
Research Design & Methods: This article uses qualitative methods of sociology, in particular biographical narratives (story of life) to explore types of intergenerational relationships.
Findings: This paper finds that relational structures are an important part of every biographical narrative. Research has identified five types of intergenerational relationships.
Implications / Recommendations: This article stresses the importance of biographical work and the restrictions on the creation of multigenerational groups as a fairly common way of integrating different generations.
Contribution / Value Added: The approach presented in this article opens new possibilities for a policy of inclusion and ways of counteracting intergenerational conflicts.
Downloads
References
Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to Sociology. A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Anchor Books.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique précédé de Trois études d’ethnologie Kabyle. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Fatyga, B. (2005). Pokolenie. In: Encyklopedia Socjologii. Suplement. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Fischer, W. (2000). Biographical work and biographical structuring in present-day societies. In: P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, T. Wengraf (Eds.). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. Comparative Issues and Examples. London – New York: Routledge.
Kholi, M., & Szydlik, M. (2000). Vorleitung. In: Kholi, M., Szydlik, M. (Hrsg.). Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Springer.
Mannheim, K. (1964). Wissenssoziologie. Auswahl aus dem Werk. Neuwied – Berlin: Luchterhand.
Mannheim, K. (1980). Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag AG.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
Schütze, F. (1981). Prozesstrukturen des Lebensablaufs. In: J. Matthes, M. Pfeinfenberger, M. Stosberg (Hrsg.). Biographie in handlungswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Nürnberg: Verlag der Nürnberger Forschungsvereinigung.
Schütze, F. (2012). Trajektorie cierpienia jako przedmiot badań socjologii interpretatywnej. In: K. Kaźmierska (Ed.). Metoda biograficzna w socjologii. Antologia tekstów. Kraków: NOMOS.
Scott, J. (2006). Generation(s). In: B.S. Turner (Ed.). The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A.L. (1987). Illness trajectories. In: Z. Bokszański, M. Czyżewski (Eds.). Approaches to the Study of Face-to-Face Interaction. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Strauss, A., & Glazer, B. (1970). Anguish: The Case Study of a Dying Trajectory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Open Access, licence: CC-BY 4.0
