Between solidarity and the conflict of generations. Intergenerational relations in biographical narratives

  • Andrzej Słaboń Cracow University of Economics
Keywords: Generation, biographical method, biographical work, relational structures

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this text is to identify the main types of intergenerational relationships and methods of integration different generations applied in everyday life. Recognition of these practices should be used in inclusion policy.

Research Design & Methods: This article uses qualitative methods of sociology, in particular biographical narratives (story of life) to explore types of intergenerational relationships.

Findings: This paper finds that relational structures are an important part of every biographical narrative. Research has identified five types of intergenerational relationships.

Implications / Recommendations: This article stresses the importance of biographical work and the restrictions on the creation of multigenerational groups as a fairly common way of integrating different generations.

Contribution / Value Added: The approach presented in this article opens new possibilities for a policy of inclusion and ways of counteracting intergenerational conflicts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrzej Słaboń, Cracow University of Economics

ul. Rakowicka 27
31-510 Kraków

References

Benjamin, A. (1969). The Helping Interview. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to Sociology. A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Anchor Books.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique précédé de Trois études d’ethnologie Kabyle. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Fatyga, B. (2005). Pokolenie. In: Encyklopedia Socjologii. Suplement. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Fischer, W. (2000). Biographical work and biographical structuring in present-day societies. In: P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, T. Wengraf (Eds.). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. Comparative Issues and Examples. London – New York: Routledge.
Kholi, M., & Szydlik, M. (2000). Vorleitung. In: Kholi, M., Szydlik, M. (Hrsg.). Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Springer.
Mannheim, K. (1964). Wissenssoziologie. Auswahl aus dem Werk. Neuwied – Berlin: Luchterhand.
Mannheim, K. (1980). Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag AG.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
Schütze, F. (1981). Prozesstrukturen des Lebensablaufs. In: J. Matthes, M. Pfeinfenberger, M. Stosberg (Hrsg.). Biographie in handlungswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Nürnberg: Verlag der Nürnberger Forschungsvereinigung.
Schütze, F. (2012). Trajektorie cierpienia jako przedmiot badań socjologii interpretatywnej. In: K. Kaźmierska (Ed.). Metoda biograficzna w socjologii. Antologia tekstów. Kraków: NOMOS.
Scott, J. (2006). Generation(s). In: B.S. Turner (Ed.). The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A.L. (1987). Illness trajectories. In: Z. Bokszański, M. Czyżewski (Eds.). Approaches to the Study of Face-to-Face Interaction. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Strauss, A., & Glazer, B. (1970). Anguish: The Case Study of a Dying Trajectory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.
Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
Słaboń, A. (2020). Between solidarity and the conflict of generations. Intergenerational relations in biographical narratives. Public Governance / Zarządzanie Publiczne, (49(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2019.49.3.04