The emergence of unintended fit and the theory of gradual institutional change: a case study of Polish employment regulations and post-crisis public policies

Keywords: public policy, institutional change, unintended fit, complementarity, historical institutionalism, drift, conversion


Objectives: This paper aims to theorise that unintended fit may emerge not only when institutions are creatively adapted by actors within the boundaries of formal rules, but also when formal rules are violated or circumvented.

Research design & methods: To that end, this paper links unintended fit more closely with the theory of gradual institutional change coming from historical institutionalism. Theoretical developments are illustrated by a case study on Polish employment regulations and post-crisis public policies.

Findings: This paper finds that unintended fit may emerge in two situations: when rules are creatively adapted by actors who use them (“conversion-type” unintended fit) or when they are both adapted and circumvented or violated  (“driftconversion-type” unintended fit). The requirements for the formation of both types of unintended fit are discussed.

Implications/ Recommendations: This paper suggests that violations and circumventions should be treated as methods of engaging institutions and that the concept of ambiguity in historical institutionalism should be revised in respect to drift.

Contribution / Value Added: This approach opens new possibilities for analysing the formation of institutional complementarities.

Article Classification: Research article.


Download data is not yet available.


Aguilera, R., & Jackson, G. (2002). Hybridization and heterogeneity across national models of corporate governance. Economic Sociology, 3(2), 17–25.
Amable, B. (2016). Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1), 79–103.
Aoki, M. (1997). Unintended fit: organizational evolution and government design of institutions in Japan. In M. Aoki et al. (Eds.), The role of government in East Asian economic development: comparative institutional analysis (pp. 233–254). New York: Clarendon Press.
Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aoki, M., Jackson, G., & Miyajima, H. (Eds.). (2007). Corporate governance in Japan: Institutional change and organizational diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arak, P. (2016) Jak naprawić klin podatkowy w Polsce. Warsaw: Polityka Insight.
Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627.
Boyer, R. (2005). Coherence, diversity, and the evolution of capitalisms: The institutional complementarity hypothesis. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2(1), 43–80.
Callaghan, H. (2010). Beyond methodological nationalism: how multilevel governance affects the clash of capitalisms. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 564–580.
Callander, S., & Krehbiel, K. (2014). Gridlock and delegation in a changing world. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 819–834.
Campbell, J. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 149–179.
Duda, K. (2016). Outsourcing usług ochrony oraz utrzymania czystości w instytucjach publicznych. pływ publicznego dyktatu najniższej ceny usług na warunki zatrudniania pracowników przez podmioty prywatne. Wrocław: Ośrodek Myśli Społecznej im. Ferdynanda Lassalle’a.
Dylong, A., & Klatka, J. (2014). Koniec z dyktatem najniższej ceny?. Przegląd Komunalny, 3, 37.
Goraus, K., & Lewandowski, P. (2016). Minimum wage violation in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: IBS.
GUS. (2016). Pracują cy w nietypowych formach zatrudnienia. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Hacker, J. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.
Hacker, J., Thelen, K., & Pierson, P. (2015). Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 180–208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (2001) Introduction. In. P. A. Hall & D. W. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. A. (2016). Politics as a process structured in space and time. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti & A. Sheingate (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 31–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Höpner, M. (2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 331–58. doi:10.1093/SER/mwi014.
Jackson, G. (2001). The origins of nonliberal corporate governance in Germany and Japan. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan compared (pp. 121–170). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jackson, G. (2005). Contested boundaries: ambiguity and creativity in the evolution of German codetermination. In W. Streeck, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: explorations in the dynamics of advanced political economies (pp. 229–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, G. (2010). Actors and Institutions. In G. Morgan et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 63–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamińska, A., & Lewandowski, P. (2015). The effects of minimum wage on a labour market with high temporary employment. Warsaw: IBS.
Labour Inspectorate. (2005–2014). Sprawozdania GIP z działalności PIP. Warsaw.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mica, A. (2017). The unintended consequences in new economic sociology: Why still not taken seriously? Social Science Information, 56(4), 544–566.
Muszyński, K. (2016). Factors behind the growth of civil law contracts as employment contracts in Poland – a study of labour law violations. Prakseologia, 158, 323–359.
Muszyński, K. (2018). Labour law violations as innovations in Central Eastern European countries. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 69(3), 9–34.
NBP. (2009). Polska wobec światowego kryzysu gospodarczego. Warsaw: Narodowy Bank Polski.
Neumark, D., & Wascher, W. (2006). Minimum wages and employment: A review of evidence from the new minimum wage research. National Bureau of Economic Research No. 12663.
OECD. (2015). Focus on minimum wages after the crisis: making them pay. OECD.
Pisarczyk, Ł. (2015). Prawo pracy wobec rozwoju zatrudnienia cywilnoprawnego. In Z. Hajn & D. Skupień (Eds.), Przyszłoś ć prawa pracy. Liber Amicorum. W pięć dziesięciolecie pracy naukowej Profesora Michała Seweryńskiego (pp. 351–355). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Public Procurement Agency. (2000–2015). Sprawozdania Urzędu Zamówień Publicznych. Warsaw.
Rocco, P., & Thurston, C. (2014). From metaphors to measures: observable indicators of gradual institutional change. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 35–62.
Schimanek, T., & Kunysz-Syrytczyk, B. (2014). Podręcznik stosowania klauzul społecznych w zamówieniach publicznych. Warsaw: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Sheingate, A. (2010). Rethinking rules: creativity and constraint in the House of Representatives. In J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency and power (pp. 168–203). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 101(4), 993–1027.
Starke, P. (2007). Radical welfare state retrenchment: a comparative analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Streeck, W. (2004). Taking uncertainty seriously: complementarity as a moving target. In Workshops/Österreichische Nationalbank, Eurosystem: proceedings of OeNB workshops (pp. 101–115). Österreichische Nationalbank.
Streeck, W. (2009). Re-forming capitalism: institutional change in the German political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Streeck, W., & Yamamura, K. (2001). The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sześciło, D. (2014). Rynek, prywatyzacja, interes publiczny: wyzwania urynkowienia usług publicznych. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Thelen, K. (2010). Beyond comparative statics: Historical institutional approaches to stability and change in the political economy of labor. In G. Morgan et al. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis (pp. 41–61). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Thelen, K., & Conran, J. (2016). Institutional change. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti & A. Sheingate (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 51–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trubek, D., & Trubek, L. (2005). The coexistence of new governance and legal regulation: Complementarity or rivalry?. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Research Committee on the Sociology of Law. Retrieved from CiteSeerX website:
Tyrowicz J. (Ed.) (2015). Raport 2014. Badanie ankietowe rynku pracy. Warsaw: Narodowy Bank Polski van der Heijden, J. (2014). Through Thelen’s lens: layering, conversion, drift, displacement and exhaustion in the development of Dutch construction
regulation. RegNet Research Paper No. 2014/46.
Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2): 122–137.
Yamamura, K., & Streeck, W. (2003). The end of diversity?: prospects for German and Japanese capitalism. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
How to Cite
Muszyński, K. (2019). The emergence of unintended fit and the theory of gradual institutional change: a case study of Polish employment regulations and post-crisis public policies. Public Governance / Zarządzanie Publiczne, (47(1), 33-47.