A Multi-Level Approach to Tackling the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Its Aftermath


Abstract

Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic brought about a new, difficult situation. The world, the international
organisations-cum-regional integration arrangements, as well as, above all, individual states all had to cope with the difficult global situation. As for the European Union, neither the Union nor the Member States were prepared for such a challenge, which is why the responses were ad hoc and uncoordinated. The aim of this study is to identify the actors involved, the measures they employed, and the extent to which their reactions converged. Another objective is to answer the question about whether their actions fit into the concept of multi-level coordination-cum-multi-level governance.

Research Design & Methods: The methods used in this article are descriptive and interpretative as well as comparative. The descriptive method is applied in all these instances where actions taken by individual actors are discussed, while the interpretative method is employed when the reasons for taking particular measures are explained. In turn, the comparative approach is applied whenever measures taken by individual actors are juxtaposed. This analytical study also provides an overview of official documents along with the relevant literature.

Findings: In the face of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic – when imminent and consistent response is essential, and when there are many decision-making centres – it is measures taken at different levels and by various actors (but jointly coordinated) that can only bring the desirable results. The measures taken in the struggle against the pandemic and its consequences also prove that the EU’s competences, albeit limited, do matter.

Implications / Recommendations: When the primary competence in the field of public health lies with the Member
States and the EU can only support and complement state actions, then a permanent, institutionalised cooperation, one based on a multilateral agreement, is worth considering.

Contribution / Value Added: In the case of international and regional organisations, and those with a global reach,
a major drawback is the lack of appropriate competences and instruments. In the EU, the lack of a systemic security mechanism anchored in the EU’s law makes it act with delay. On the one hand, this study points to the shortcomings in legal solutions, but on the other, it demonstrates the importance of joint and coordinated actions. It also shows that competences of non-state actors do matter, too.


Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; European Union; multilevel governance; coordination; crisis

Alemanno A. (2020). The European Response to COVID19. From Regulatory Emulation to Regulatory Coordination. EJRR, 11(2), 307-316
Carreño I., Dolle T., Brandenburger M., Medina L. (2020). The implications of the Covid-19 pandemic on trade. EJRR, 11(2), 402-410
Dobbs M. (2020). National Governance of Public Health Responses in a Pandemic? EJRR, 11(2) 240-248
Micklitz H.-W. (2020). The COVID-19 Threat: An Opportunity to Rethink the European Economic Constitution and European Private Law. EJRR, 11(2), 249-255
Pacces A.M., Weimer M. (2020). From diversity to coordination: A European approach to Covid19. EJRR. 11(2), 283-296
Purnhagen K.P., de Ruijter A., Flear M.L., Hervey T.K., Herwig A. (2020). More Competences than You Knew? The Web of Health Competence for European Union Action in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak, EJRR, 11(2), 297-306
Renda A., Castro R.J. (2020). Towards Stronger EU Governance of Health Threats after the COVID-19 Pandemic, EJRR, 273-282
Rudan I. (2019). A cascade of causes that led to the COVID-19 tragedy in Italy and in other European Union countries. J Glob Health, 10(1), 1-10
Zanin G.M., Gentile E., Parisi A., Spasiano D. (2020). A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(9), 3024-3044
(a) Communication from the Commission Guidance from the European Commission on using the public procurement framework in the emergency situation related to the COVID-19 crisis (OJ C 108I, 1.4.2020, p. 1-5)
(b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council covid-19: Temporary Restriction on Non-Essential Travel to the EU (COM/2020/115 final)
(c) Communication from the Commission COVID-19 Guidance on the implementation of the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU, on the facilitation of transit arrangements for the repatriation of EU citizens, and on the effects on visa policy (OJ C 102I, 30.3.2020, p. 3-11)
(d) Communication from the Commission on the implementation of the Green Lanes under the Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services (OJ C 96I, 24.3.2020, p. 1-7)
(e) Communication from the Commission Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (OJ C 91I, 20.3.2020, p. 1-9)
(f) Communication from the Commission Amendment to the Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (OJ C 112I, 4.4.2020, p. 1-9)
(a) Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2020/402 of 14 March 2020 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation (OJ L 77I, 15.3.2020, p. 1-7) no longer in force
(b) Commission Decision (EU) 2020/491 of 3 April 2020 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption on importation granted for goods needed to combat the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak during 2020 (OJ L 103I, 3.4.2020, p. 1-3)
Council Decision of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause (OJ L 192, 1.7.2014, p. 53-58)
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1993 of 11 December 2018 on the EU Integrated Political Crisis Response Arrangements (OJ L 320, 17.12.2018, p. 28-34)
Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community (OJ L 268, 3.10.1998, p. 1-7)
(a) Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 2119/98/EC (OJ L 293, 5.11.2013, p. 1-15)
(b) Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 924-947)
Decision (EU) 2019/420 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2019 amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 77I , 20.3.2019, p. 115)
(a) European Commission Decision of 16.3.2020 setting up the Commission’s advisory panel on COVID 19, Brussels, 16.3.2020 C(2020) 1799 final
Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services (OJ C 86I,16.3.2020, p. 1-4)
Joint European Roadmap towards lifting COVID-19 containment measures 2020/C 126/01 (OJ C 126, 17.4.2020, p. 1-11)
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 as regards specific measures to mobilise investments in the health care systems of the Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (COM/2020/113 final)
Protecting humanity from future health crises. Report of the High-level Panel on the Global Response to Health Crises, 9 February 2016 (A/70/723)
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European Centre for disease prevention and control (OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 1-11)
Resolution 2532 (2020) adopted by the Security Council on 1 July 2020 (S/RES/2532 (2020))
Special meeting of the European Council (17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 July 2020) – Conclusions, Brussels, 21 July 2020
A roadmap for recovery. Towards a more resilient, sustainable and fair Europe, 21 April 2020;
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/43384/roadmap-for-recovery-final-21-04-2020.pdf
A world at risk: Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), World Health Organization (WHO), September 2019;
https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf
Communicable Disease Threats Report, Week 4, ECDC, 19-25 January 2020;
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/communicable-disease-threats-report-19-25-january-2020-week-4
de Ruijter Anniek, Beetsma Roel, Burgoon Brian, Nicoli Francesco, Vandenbroucke Frank, Give the EU more power to fight epidemics, Politico, 26 March 2020;
https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-eu-power-pandemic
DG Azevêdo requests WTO members to share information on trade measures related to COVID-19, 25 March 2020; https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/dgra_24mar20_e.htm
(b) European solidarity in the face of COVID-19, 22 April 2020;
https://cy.ambafrance.org/European-solidarity-in-the-face-of-COVID-19
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Mitigating impacts of COVID-19 on food trade and markets, 31 March 2020; http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1268719/icode
G20 Leaders’ Statement, Extraordinary G20 Leaders’ Summit Statement on COVID-19, 26 March 2020;
https://g20.org/en/media/Documents/G20_Extraordinary%20G20%20Leaders%E2%80%99%20Summit_Statement_EN%20(3).pdf
Janssen D., Kucharczyk M., Pazura N., Koronawirus: Protesty w Holandii przeciwko ograniczeniom społecznym, 6 maj 2020; https://www.euractiv.pl/section/bezpieczenstwo-i-obrona/news/koronawirus-protest-haga-holandia-ograniczenia-restrykcje-lockdown-epidemia
Olofsdotter K., Op-Ed: Sweden refused to impose a coronavirus lockdown. The country’s ambassador explains why, Los Angeles Times, 2 May 2020;
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-05-02/sweden-coronavirus-voluntary-strategy
Revision of the International Health Regulations (2005);
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/20353/WHA58_3-en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, UNDRR (2015);
https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Geneva, 30 January 2020;
https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)
Supporting Scientific Research - New Monthly COVID-19 News Round Up, 1 May 2020;
https://www.researchconnect.eu/archive/supporting-scientific-research-new-monthly-covid-19-news-round-up
Using face masks in the community - Reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks, ECDC, Stockholm 8 April 2020;
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/COVID-19-use-face-masks-community.pdf
WCO-WTO Joint Statement on COVID-19 related trade measures, 6 April 2020;
http://www.wcoomd.org/en/media/newsroom/2020/april/wco-wto-joint-statement-on-covid-19-related-trade-measures.aspx
WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, 11 March 2020;
https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
World Trade Organization, Trade in medical goods in the context of tackling covid-19, 3 April 2020;
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/rese_03apr20_e.pdf
Download

Published : 2021-09-02


Kabat-Rudnicka, D. (2021). A Multi-Level Approach to Tackling the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Its Aftermath. Public Governance / Zarządzanie Publiczne, 53(3), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2020.53.3.05

Danuta Kabat-Rudnicka  kabatd@uek.krakow.pl
  Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-4481

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.