A Vision for Recovery Models of Ukrainian Cities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/PG.2022.59.1.06

Keywords:

cities, recovery, sustainable growth, theoretical models

Abstract

Objectives: The direction of the research is determined by the necessity to generalise and systematise knowledge about the ways of forming and organising the material and spatial environment of human activity at the territorial level, adapted to the needs of modernity. It needs to meet the tasks of sustainable development. The result of the work will be the selection of basic models that will deepen the understanding of the nature of the modern functioning of the living environment as well as will be able to serve as an ideological basis for the reconstruction of war-ravaged settlements of Ukraine.

Research Design & Methods: In order to explore the methods for the recovery of Ukrainian cities, I have studied the European experience of modern architectural and urban planning practice in the cities of Austria (Vienna, Graz, 2022), Germany (Munich, Bielefeld, 2022), and Poland (Kraków, Wrocław, 2022). The main part of the research begins with the selection of attributive categories and the generalisation of various ways of organising the residential environment, which are in the vision of modern European city planning and are expressed through specific concepts and categories. Next, it was about the models that fix the connections and relationships essential to the specified conditions.

Findings: The formation of residential units in Austria, Germany, and Poland made it possible to identify five basic models. Each of them is guided by theories, principles, concepts, and categories relevant to the essence of the model, but they are united by the paradigm of sustainable development. The contents of the proposed models open as follows: the formal model is focused on the harmonisation of the urban environment; the classical model is about the compliance with industry standards; the socio-economic model is involves ensuring equal and sufficient opportunities for citizens; the ecological model values the preservation and restoration of the natural environment; and the conceptual model is about producing ideas based on innovations.

Implications / Recommendations: Such models do not necessarily have to be tied to specific places, but they are capable of initiating the introduction of new ideas and technologies into the organisation of the material and spatial environment of human life.

Contribution / Value Added: This work is largely related to the filling of a theoretical lacuna that exists in the theory of urban planning, and is provoked by the development of special forms of the social, material, and spatial organisation of the residential environment within a certain territory and under certain conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘WAGNIS’ / PARTICIPATION AND PLANNING (2016). Urbalize. Available at: https://urbalize.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/wagnis-participation-and-planning/ (accessed: 30.08.2022).

Buchholz, T., & Weigel, O. (2021). Die Neue Leipzig-Charta und ihr Umsetzungsdokument: Vom politischen Dokument in die Praxis der Stadtentwicklung. EUROPA kommunal 1: Städtische und Ländliche Entwicklung [online], pp. 3–7. Available at: https://www.rgre.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/publikationen/ek_artikel_19-22/ek1-2021_Beitrag.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Caniggia, G., & Maffei, G. (2001). Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting basic building. Translation from Italian by S. J. Frazer. Alinea Editrice.

Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27.

Curdes, G. (2010). Urban morphology and climate change. Which morphology can survive? Proceedings of 17th conference international seminar on urban form – ISUF – ‘Formation and Persistence of Townscape’ Hamburg and Lübeck. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259285546_Urban_morphology_and_climate_change_Which_morphology_can_survive (accessed: 06.11.2022).

Curdes, G. (2015). Spatial organisation of towns at the level of the smallest urban unit. 10.13140/RG.2.1.2094.9841. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286342591_Spatial_organisation_of_towns_at_the_level_of_the_smallest_urban_unit (accessed: 30.08.2022).

Die Seestast Wiens: Official site. Available at: https://www.aspern-seestadt.at (accessed: 30.08.2022).

Durington, M. (2011). Review Essay – Gated Communities Perspectives on Privatized Spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01033_1.x

Frey, H. (2005). Designing the City: Towards a more sustainable urban form. Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/37991738/Designing_the_City (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Google Earth 7.3, 2022. Rivenʹ danykh 3D-budivelʹ. Available at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Grant, J., & Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 913–930. DOI:10.1068/b3165

Idak, Yu (2020). Bases of the theory of morphology of the city. The thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Architecture. Lviv Polytechnic National University.

Idak, Yu (2021). Establishment and development of morphology as a basic science and its potential in the theory of urban planning. Architectural Studies, 7(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.23939/as2021.02.173

Jabareen, J. R. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 38–52. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05285119

Kapushchak, K., Hnes, N., & Idak, Yu. (2021). Ways of modernization and improvement of architectural education in Ukraine. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 1(29), 1–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30032021/7489 (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Kropf, K. (2017). The Handbook of Urban Morphology. John Wiley & Sons. DOI:10.1002/9781118747711

Litfin, K. (2012). A whole new way of life: Ecovillages and the revitalization of deep community. In R. D. Young & T. Princen (Eds.), The localization reader: Adapting to the coming downshift (pp. 129–140). The MIT Press.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. The M.I.T. Press.

Makuha, M. (2022). V Ukraїni zruĭnovano ponad 350 tysyach obiektiv ta milʹĭony kvadratnykh metriv infrastruktury. Nerukhomistʹ [online] 2 June. Available at: https://thepage.ua/ua/news/v-ukrayinizrujnovano-ponad-350-tisyach-obyektiv-infrastrukturi (accessed: 06.11.2022).

Nʹoltinh, I. (2020). Sylʹni mista – sylʹna Ukraїna (In Ukranian). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. Available at: https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2020-uk-starkestaedte-starke-ukraine.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Oliveira, V. (2013). Morpho: A methodology for morphological analysis. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 149–161.

Pleshkanovska, A. (2019). City Master Plan: Forecasting Methodology Problems (on the example of the Master Plans of Kyiv). Transfer of Innovative Technologies, 2(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.31493/tit1921.0201

Pleshkanovsʹka, A. M. (2008). Rekonstruktsia mista v konteksti problem misʹkoho rozvytku. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, 19, 225–231.

Pleshkanovskaya, A. (2020). University as the Core of the Functional Planning Organization of an Innovative City. Pidvodni tehnologii, 10, 74–83. DOI:10.32347/uwt2020.10.1902

Saraiva, A. F. P. (n.d). The morphological analysis as a support for urban planning: The case study of the Gate of Carcais. Available at: https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/844820067123327/Ext_abstract_FINAL.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Sevier, L., Henderson, M., & Naidu, N. (2008). Eco villages: A model Life? The Ecologist, June 3, 2008. Available at: https://theecologist.org/2008/jun/03/ecovillages-model-life (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Shmyhal, D. (2022). In the Lugano Declaration of the Conference, the heads of state and government pledged to support Ukraine on its path to recovery. Government portal: Official website. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/denys-shmyhal-u-deklaratsii-konferentsii-v-luhano-hlavy-derzhav-iuriadiv-zoboviazalysia-pidtrymuvaty-ukrainu-na-ii-shliakhu-do-vidnovlennia (accessed: 30.08.2022).

Singh, B., Keitsch, M., & Shrestha, M. (2019). Scaling up sustainability: Concepts and practices of the ecovillage approach. Sustainable Development, 27(5). DOI:10.1002/sd.1882

Solovchuk, L. (2022). Ukraїna vtratyla 45 mln kv. m zhytlovoho fondu pislia vtorhnennia rf. Nerukhomistʹ [online] 8 June. Available at: https://thepage.ua/ua/real-estate/vtorgnennya-rf-vtrati-zhitlovogo-fondu-45-mln-kvadratnih-metriv-vartistyu-v-dollar40-mlrd (accessed: 06.11.2022).

Stratehiia staloho rozvytku Ukraїny do 2030 roku (proekt). (2018, serpenʹ). Proekt Zakonu Ukraїny vid 07.08.2018 № 9015. Available at: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/JH6YF00A?an=332 (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Timokhin, V. O. (2019). Problemy i shliakhy rozvytku arkhitekturno-mistobudivnoho seredovyshcha v Ukraїni. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoho universytetu “Lʹvivsʹka politekhnika”. Seriia: Arkhitektura, 1(2s), 80–85.

Timokhin, V. O. (2020). Tendentsiї ta perspektyvy arkhitektonichnykh peretvoren’ mis’koho seredovyshcha ĭ urbanizovanoho ototochennia. Dosvid ta perspektyvy rozvytku mist Ukraїny, 34, 24–33.

Ukaz prezydenta Ukraїny Pro Stratehiiu staloho rozvytku ‘Ukraїna – 2020’ Adoption on January 12, 2015: [online]. Kyїv: President of Ukraine. Available through: the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine website: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/5/2015?lang=en#Text (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Weigel, O. (2021). Die Neue Leipzig-Charta – Von der Strategie zur Umsetzung. Stadtentwicklung [online]. Available at: https://www.vhw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/08_publikationen/verbandszeitschrift/FWS/2021/2_2021/FWS_2_21_Weigel.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Werkviertel: Official site. Available at: https://www.werkviertel.de/startseite.html (accessed: 20.10.2022).

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Idak, Y. (2022). A Vision for Recovery Models of Ukrainian Cities. Journal of Public Governance, 59(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.15678/PG.2022.59.1.06