Participatory Budget as a Form of Social Participation: The Example of Communes in Poland in 2020–2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/PG.2024.68.2.01Keywords:
local government, participatory budget, public managementAbstract
Objective: In the process of managing a commune, the needs of the community inhabiting the area of a given commune are met, and the commune budget constitutes the basis of the commune’s financial management. The commune budget is an annual plan of income and expenses as well as the commune’s revenues and expenditures. Communes enable the residents to decide how to spend part of the budget in the form of a participatory budget. The aim of this article is to identify and assess the activity of various types of communes in the field of participatory budget planning in Poland, as well as to explain the reasons behind differences in the level of the commitment.
Research Design & Methods: Selected literature references in the subject scope of the article are analysed. In addition, an analysis of secondary data was performed regarding the number of communes with a planned amount of participatory budget. The analysis is conducted considering the criterion of the type of commune (rural, urban, rural-urban). The time scope of the analysis covers the years 2020–2022.
Findings: The share of communes that invite inhabitants to participate in the decision-making process on how to spend part of public money as participatory budget is quite low. In the years 2020–2022, 12.27%, 11.18%, and 12.92% of all communes in Poland planned a participatory budget. In 2021, compared to 2020, there was a smaller number of communes that had a planned participatory budget. This could be due to the COVID-19 pandemic that had been ongoing since 2020. The level of offering communities the participation in the decision-making process differs in various types of communes, and that differentiation is statistically valid. Since the sources of such differences mainly can come from social, cultural, economic, or political reasons, they were explored more deeply.
Implications / Recommendations: Due to the diversity of the types of communes in terms of population, it is recommended that an analysis be conducted according to the discussed determinants. The results may be helpful for local managers in terms of including them into the local sustainable strategy participatory budget instrument and following Sherry Arnstein’s (2019) ladder process while considering local constraints and opportunities.
Contribution / Value Added: The exploration of participatory budget mostly concentrated on larger urban communes. However, the delved analysis of the implementation of participatory budget in rural or rural-urban communes was not so popular. The added value is the analysis according to the type of communes as well as the discussion on the reasons behind such differences. The paper contributes to the discussion of the stimulators and inhibitors of the implementation of such a tool in creating locally social capital and tightening relations among different stakeholders in the name of common good.
Article classification: research article
JEL classification: H7, O2, R5
Downloads
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1975). A working model for public participation. Public Administration Review, 35(1), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/975206
Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34.
Bachnik, K., Kaźmierczak, M., Rojek-Nowosielska, M., Stefańska, M., & Szumniak-Samolej, J. (2024). Identifying social impact. In K. Bachnik, M. Kaźmierczak, M. Rojek-Nowosielska, M. Stefańska, & J. Szumniak-Samolej (Eds.), Social Impact, Organizations and Society: The Contemporary Role of Corporate Social Responsibility. Routledge.
Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodova, L. (2020). How a Participatory Budget Can Support Sustainable Rural Development: Lessons From Poland. Sustainability, 12, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072620
Brol, M., & Derlukiewicz, N. (2023). Budżet obywatelski w największych polskich miastach – perspektywa urzędników i aktywistów. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
Cabannes, Y., & Lipietz, B. (2018). Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and Urbanization, 30(1), 67–84.
Centrum Informatyki Statystycznej (2024). TERYT – TERC. Liczba jednostek podziału terytorialnego kraju według stanu na 1.01.2020, 1.01.2021, 1.01.2022. Available at: https://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eteryt/raporty/WebRaportZestawienie.aspx [accessed: 15.09.2023].
Ćwiklicki, M. (2019). Metody zarządzania wartością publiczną. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Ćwiklicki, M., & Pilch, K. (2020). Understanding public value through its Methods. Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance, (1/51), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2020.51.1.04
Foundation for the Development of Local Democracy named after Jerzy Regulski (2021). Wpływ epidemii na działalność JST, available at: https://frdl.org.pl/static/upload/store/frdl/RAPORTY/Wplyw_epidemii_na_dzialalnosc_JST.pdf [accessed: 15.09.2023].
GUS (2020). Jakość życia i kapitał społeczny w Polsce. Wyniki Badania spójności społecznej 2018. Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Jeran, A., Matczak, P., & Mączka, K. (2018). Kto wdraża budżet obywatelski, a kto nie? Porównanie wielkopolskich gmin pod kątem zamożności oraz poziomu aktywności społecznej. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 64, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.64.08
Kalisiak-Mędelska, M. (2011). Partycypacja społeczna – przymus czy rzeczywista potrzeba? Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 241, 262–276.
Klimovsky, D., Junjan, V., & Nemec, J. (2021). Selected Factors Determining the Adoption and Use of Participatory Budgeting in Central and Eastern Europe. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 21(2), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.210206
Krasnowolski, A. (2020), Budżety obywatelskie (partycypacyjne). Historia instytucji i jej funkcjonowanie w polskich samorządach. Opracowania tematyczne, 682, Kancelaria Senatu.
Kudłacz, M., & Zhebchuk, R. (2019). Participatory budget in metropolises as instrument of direct democracy in public management: experience of Poland and Ukraine. Journal of Public Governance, 49(3), 63–76.
Lehtonen, P. (2022). Policy on the move: the enabling settings of participation in participatory budgeting. Policy Studies, 43(5), 1036–1054. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2021.1895981
Martela, B., Janik, L., & Bubak, G. (2022). Barometr budżetu obywatelskiego, Ekspertyzy i opracowania badawcze, Obserwatorium Polityki Miejskiej IRMiR, Ekspertyzy i opracowania badawcze. Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów.
Martela, B., Janik L., & Mróz K. (2023). Barometr budżetu obywatelskiego. Edycja 2022. Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów.
Miasto 2077 (2019). Raport – budżet obywatelski w polskich miastach. Available at: https://www.miasto2077.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Raport-Budz%CC%87ety-Obywatelskie-w-polskich-miastach.pdf [accessed: 15.09.2023].
Milosavljević, M., Spasenić, Ž., & Krivokapić, J. (2023). Bibliometric Review of Participatory Budgeting: Current Status and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030104
MSWiA (2024). Fundusz sołecki. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/mswia/fundusz-solecki [accessed: 15.09.2023].
Oh, Y., Jeong, S. H., & Shin, H. (2019). A strategy for a sustainable local government: Are participatory governments more efficient, effective, and equitable in the budget process? Sustainability, 11(19), 5312.
Ostachowski, P. (2021). Budżet partycypacyjny jako wskaźnik aktywności społeczności lokalnych w przebudowie przestrzeni wybranych miast regionu świętokrzyskiego przed i w czasie pandemii COVID-19. Studia Politologica, 336(26), 150–164.
Polish Act of 8th March, 1990, on Commune Self-Government. Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19900160095/U/D19900095Lj.pdf [accessed: 15.09.2023].
Polish Act of 5th June, 1998, on County Self-Government. Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19980910578/U/D19980578Lj.pdf [accessed: 15.09.2023].
Schugurensky, D., & Mook, L. (2024). Participatory budgeting and local development: Impacts, challenges, and prospects. Local Development & Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2024.2391664
Sinervo, L. M., Bartocci, L., Lehtonen, P., & Ebdon, C. (2024). Toward sustainable governance with participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 36(1), 1–19.
Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 164–178. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
Sobol, A., & Rzeńca, A. (2018). Budżet partycypacyjny jako narzędzie polityki rozwoju małych miast województwa śląskiego i łódzkiego. Space – Society – Economy, 24, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-3180.24.06
Sorychta-Wojsczyk, B. (2015). Uwarunkowania wykorzystania budżetu obywatelskiego w administracji publicznej w Polsce. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 421–430.
Svobodová, L., & Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2020). SMART City and Economy: Bibliographic Coupling and Co-occurrence. In M. Hattingh, H. Matthee, I. Smuts, Y. Pappas, M. Dwivedi, & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology (pp. 102–113). Springer.
Sześciło, D., & Wilk, B. (2018). Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund. Central European Public Administration Review, 16(2), 179–192.
Touchton, M., McNulty, S., & Wampler, B. (2024). Participatory budgeting and well-being: governance and sustainability in comparative perspective. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 36(1), 105–123.
Wampler, B. et al. (2022). Impacts of participatory budgeting: What we know. People Powered, Research Brief, April, 2–15.
Wampler, B., McNulty, S., & Touchton, M. (2021). Where It All Began: PB in Latin America, Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897756.003.0004
White, M., & Langenheim, N. (2021). A ladder-truss of citizen participation: Re-imagining Arnstein’s ladder to bridge between the community and sustainable urban design outcomes. Journal of Design Research, 19(1–3), 155–183.
Xu, R., Sun, Q., & Si, W. (2015). The third wave of public administration: The new public governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11–21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Krakow University of Economic
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
