The Asymmetry of Access to Public Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/PG.2023.65.3.03Keywords:
public data, data asymmetry, data governanceAbstract
Objective: This paper critically investigates the phenomenon of asymmetrical access to public data, a growing issue in our increasingly digitised society. Its objective is identify the root causes of asymmetry in access to public data and to propose solutions that would promote greater transparency and fairness, and foster citizen participation in public life.
Research Design & Methods: The research section includes the analysis of the users of the Internet in the context of using government websites or applications by income group, age group, and place of residence. Then, the R-Pearson linear correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between the mentioned variables.
Findings: The study shows the presence of a digital divide within Poland, attributing its existence to several factors including income, educational attainment, residential location, and age. This divide encompasses not merely the accessibility of digital networks but extends to the competence required to effectively utilize these resources. Furthermore, the research highlights a significant correlation between one’s level of education and their proficiency in utilizing digital tools and conducting information searches on the internet.
Implications/Recommendations: To reduce asymmetry in access to public data, policymakers should focus on creating open, user-friendly data portals with standard formats and detailed metadata. Engaging in public consultations can tailor accessibility to community needs, while partnerships with educational and non-profit organisations can offer training to enhance data utilisation skills. Such strategies aim to democratise data access, ensuring it serves a broad and diverse audience effectively.
Contribution/ Value Added: The research confirms the existence of a digital divide in Poland, and some of the factors are income level, education, place of residence, and age. The gap is not only about access to the network, but also about the ability to use it. In addition, familiarity with digital tools and the ability to search for information online are strongly related to education level. Analysing the accessibility of public data in the context of income, we note that the higher the income, the higher the percentage of people using public administration online. The analysis also shows that older citizens, despite being the group least likely to use the Internet, have seen the greatest increase in regular Internet use over the studied period, in contrast to teenagers and young adults.
Article classification: research article
Keywords: public data; data asymmetry; data governance
JEL O38, O36, H4
Downloads
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quartely Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P., & Boyd, B. K. (2018). Information Asymmetry in Management Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798026
Blomberg M., Altschwager D., Seo H., Booton E., & Nwachukwu, M., (2021). Digital divide and marginalized women during COVID-19: A study of women recently released from prison. Information, Communication and Society, 24(14), 2113–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1963462
Cendrowicz, D., & Chrisidu-Budnik, A. (Eds.), Asymmetric Information in Public Administration. C.H. Beck.
Flakiewicz, W. (1974). Podejmowanie decyzji kierowniczych. PWE.
Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E., Kattouw, R., & Dedding, C. (2019). “Just having a computer doesn’t make sense”: The digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2347–2365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819846059
Griffin, R. W. (2004). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Hammond, A. (1997). The Telecommunications Act of 1996: Codifying the digital divide. Federal Communications Law Journal, 50(1), 179–214.
Jones, M., & Silberzahn, P. (2016). Without An Opinion, You’re Just Another Person With Data. Forbes, Mar 15. https://www.forbes.com/sites/silberzahnjones/2016/03/15/without-an-opinion-youre-justanother-person-with-data/?sh=20e25b41699f (accessed: 15.04.2023).
Kuczmera-Ludwiczyńska, E., Romanowska, M., Sopińska, A., & Wachowiak, P. (2002). Podejmowanie decyzji w organizacjach. In M. Romanowska (Ed.), Podstawy organizacji i zarządzania (pp. 145–182). Difin.
Malomo, F., & Sena, V. (2017). Data Intelligence for Local Government? Assessing the Benefits and Barriers to Use of Big Data in the Public Sector. Policy & Internet, 9(1), 7–27.
Marty, F., & Warin, T. (2020). Digital Platforms’ Information Concentration: From Keystone Players to Gatekeepers. CIRANO Working Papers, 2020s-70. https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2020s-70.pdf (accessed: May 12th, 2023).
Możdżeń, M. (2015). Współrządzenie a nowa ekonomia instytucjonalna. In S. Mazur (Ed.), Współzarządzanie publiczne (pp. 65–92). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
The Power of Gatekeepers Who Control Data and Information in a Digital World. Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/power-of-gatekeepers-who-control-data-and-information-in-a-digital-world.htm (accessed: 12.05.2023).
Rogers, S. (2016). Bridging the 21st Century Digital Divide. TechTrends, 60, 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0057-0
Romanowska, M. (2008). Podejmowanie decyzji w organizacji. In M. Strużycki (Ed.), Podstawy zarządzania (s. 109–128). Szkoła Główna Handlowa Oficyna Wydawnicza.
Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce w 2022 roku (2022). Główny Urząd Statystyczny w Polsce, Urząd Statystyczny w Szczecinie.
Stawasz, D. (2011). Uwarunkowania sprawności zarządzania w samorządowej administracji publicznej. In D. Stawasz, D. Drzazga, C. Szydłowski, Wybrane aspekty sprawności zarządzania w administracji publicznej (pp. 115–148). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2004). Ekonomia sektora publicznego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Szpunar, M. (2007). Digital Divide, a nowe formy stratyfikacji społecznej w społeczeństwie informacyjnym – próba typologizacji. In K. Wódz, T. Wieczorek (Eds.), Społeczeństwo informacyjne. Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu w Dąbrowie Górniczej.
Ustawa o informatyzacji działalności podmiotów realizujących zadania publiczne z dnia 17 lutego 2005 r., Dz. U. nr 64, poz. 565, z późn. zm.
Verhulst, S. (2022). The ethical imperative to identify and address data and intelligence asymmetries. AI & Society, 39, 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01410-5
Verhulst, S., & Young, A. (2022). Identifying and addressing data asymmetries so as to enable (better) science. Frontiers in Big Data, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.888384
Wrana, K., Kmieć, B., & Kmieć, T. (2014). Zarządzanie miastem w chmurze – Cloud City. Studia Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN, 157, 94–95.
Wyzwania i perspektywy w udostępnianiu danych sektora prywatnego wraz z rekomendacjami dla administracji rządowej (2021). Zespół ekspertów Laboratorium Otwartych Danych, Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, typescript. https://cms.dane.gov.pl/documents/90/Wyzwania_i_perspektywy_w_udost%C4%99pnianiu_danych_prywatnych.pdf (accessed: 15.06.2023).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Public Governance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access, licence: CC-BY 4.0
