Tipping the balance: autopoiesis and governance

Authors

  • Andrew Dunsire University of York

Keywords:

modern society, autopoietic systems, control of social systems, subsidies, partnership with intermediary organizations, reflection law, colibacy, monocentrism, polycentrism

Abstract

A modern society, according to autopoietic and other analyses, comprises social systems that show organizational closure and self-referentiality, partly explaining widely perceived regulatory failure. This article compares four possible mechanisms for governance or steering of such systems, compatible with their autopoiesis: the use of subsidy, partnership with intermediary bodies, reflexive law, and a technique of government intervention that is ancient and common but not recognized, here named collibration. Some social actors exist mainly to check and balance other actors (e.g., employers’ organizations and trade unions, or buyers and sellers in a market) and are self-referential only as a pair system. This pair system is then self-policing but can be steered, within limits, by tipping the balance that is being maintained – as exemplified by price-loading taxes, cooling-off periods, and sport handicapping.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-09

How to Cite

Dunsire, A. (2007). Tipping the balance: autopoiesis and governance. Journal of Public Governance, 2(2), 39-66. https://publicgovernance.pl/zpub/article/view/72